Learning-based methodologies increasingly find applications in safety-critical domains like autonomous driving and medical robotics. Due to the rare nature of dangerous events, real-world testing is prohibitively expensive and unscalable. In this work, we employ a probabilistic approach to safety evaluation in simulation, where we are concerned with computing the probability of dangerous events. We develop a novel rare-event simulation method that combines exploration, exploitation, and optimization techniques to find failure modes and estimate their rate of occurrence. We provide rigorous guarantees for the performance of our method in terms of both statistical and computational efficiency. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on a variety of scenarios, illustrating its usefulness as a tool for rapid sensitivity analysis and model comparison that are essential to developing and testing safety-critical autonomous systems.

Learning-based methodologies increasingly find applications in safety-critical domains like autonomous driving and medical robotics. Due to the rare nature of dangerous events, real-world testing is prohibitively expensive and unscalable. In this work, we employ a probabilistic approach to safety evaluation in simulation, where we are concerned with computing the probability of dangerous events. We develop a novel rare-event simulation method that combines exploration, exploitation, and optimization techniques to find failure modes and estimate their rate of occurrence. We provide rigorous guarantees for the performance of our method in terms of both statistical and computational efficiency.

In this paper, we introduce a probabilistic approach to risk assessment of robot systems by focusing on the impact of uncertainties. While various approaches to identifying systematic hazards (e.g., bugs, design flaws, etc.) can be found in current literature, little attention has been devoted to evaluating risks in robot systems in a probabilistic manner. Existing methods rely on discrete notions for dangerous events and assume that the consequences of these can be described by simple logical operations. In this work, we consider measurement uncertainties as one main contributor to the evolvement of risks. Specifically, we study the impact of temporal and spatial uncertainties on the occurrence probability of dangerous failures, thereby deriving an approach for an uncertainty-aware risk assessment. Secondly, we introduce a method to improve the statistical significance of our results: While the rare occurrence of hazardous events makes it challenging to draw conclusions with reliable accuracy, we show that importance sampling -- a technique that successively generates samples in regions with sparse probability densities -- allows for overcoming this issue. We demonstrate the validity of our novel uncertainty-aware risk assessment method in three simulation scenarios from the domain of human-robot collaboration. Finally, we show how the results can be used to evaluate arbitrary safety limits of robot systems.

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-3, have demonstrated remarkable natural language processing and generation capabilities and have been applied to a variety tasks, such as source code generation. This paper explores the potential of integrating LLMs in the hazard analysis for safety-critical systems, a process which we refer to as co-hazard analysis (CoHA). In CoHA, a human analyst interacts with an LLM via a context-aware chat session and uses the responses to support elicitation of possible hazard causes. In this experiment, we explore CoHA with three increasingly complex versions of a simple system, using Open AI's ChatGPT service. The quality of ChatGPT's responses were systematically assessed to determine the feasibility of CoHA given the current state of LLM technology. The results suggest that LLMs may be useful for supporting human analysts performing hazard analysis.